Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Board denied service connection for a low back disability due to lack of evidence linking the condition to service or any other related conditions.,Compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 was denied for diabetic retinopathy of left eye with macular edema as there is no evidence that VA's care caused the worsening of the condition.,The Board also denied compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for left foot osteomyelitis, status post left first ray amputation due to lack of evidence showing VA negligence or fault in causing the disability.

The deciding factor: The preponderance of evidence did not support a finding that the low back condition was related to service.,There is no evidence that VA's care caused the worsening of the diabetic retinopathy, and the Veteran had non-compliance with treatment recommendations which led to complications.,VA's care in amputating the left foot due to osteomyelitis did not cause additional disability as the condition was unavoidable given the Veteran's diabetes.

Claimed conditions
low back disability, diabetic retinopathy of left eye with macular edema (claimed as going blind), left foot osteomyelitis, status post left first ray amputation (claimed as left foot big toe bunion)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
December 12, 2019
Citation
19192817

Veterans Law Judge

H. N. SCHWARTZ

Decisions by this judge: 2,480 · Granted: 26% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19192817.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.