The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining an addendum medical opinion to resolve a discrepancy between two previous medical opinions.
The deciding factor: An additional remand is required due to the failure to comply with prior remand orders.
- Claimed conditions
- back, neck
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 10, 2019
- Citation
- 19192931
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19192931.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The appeal for service connection for back and bilateral knee conditions was withdrawn by the Veteran.
- Dismissed
The appeal was dismissed due to the death of the appellant, and no substitute has been filed within the required timeframe.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for increased ratings and service connection was dismissed due to a late filing.
- Dismissed
The veteran's appeal was dismissed due to the untimely filing of the Board Appeal request.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.