Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Board has remanded the claims for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, bilateral knee disability, headaches, cardiac disease, and memory loss due to insufficient information in the record.,The Veteran's DM is being remanded as there was no consideration of his lifestyle and diet during service or exposure to environmental hazards while serving in Southwest Asia.,The Veteran's bilateral knee disability is being remanded because the examiner did not consider the February 1993 report indicating degenerative joint disease, nor the Veteran’s history of knee pain since service.,The Veteran's headaches are being remanded due to insufficient consideration of his reported history and March 2015 VA treatment record.,The Veteran's CAD is being remanded as there was no consideration of his lifestyle and diet during service or exposure to environmental hazards while serving in the Persian Gulf War.,The Veteran's memory loss is being remanded due to insufficient consideration of his other diagnosed conditions.

The deciding factor: More information is needed regarding the etiology of each condition, including considering the Veteran’s history and any relevant medical records not yet obtained.,The examiner did not adequately consider the Veteran’s lifestyle and diet during service or exposure to environmental hazards while serving in Southwest Asia.,The examiner did not adequately address the Veteran's report of knee pain since service and his February 1993 report indicating degenerative joint disease.,The examiner did not adequately consider the March 2015 VA treatment record regarding the Veteran’s headaches, which suggested a possible link to an in-service accident.,The examiner did not adequately address whether the Veteran's CAD is related to his lifestyle and diet during service or exposure to environmental hazards while serving in the Persian Gulf War.,The examiner did not consider the Veteran's history of other diagnosed conditions when evaluating the etiology of his memory loss.

Claimed conditions
Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus, Type II, Bilateral Knee Disability including Degenerative Arthritis, Headaches, Cardiac Disease including Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Memory Loss
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 12, 2019
Citation
19193181

Veterans Law Judge

M. SORISIO

Decisions by this judge: 1,680 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19193181.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.