Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's initial disability ratings for his painful left wrist scar, residual scars of the right knee, and other disabilities are denied. The Board finds that new examinations are needed to determine the current severity of these conditions.,The Veteran’s claims for increased ratings are REMANDED as there is insufficient evidence regarding the current severity of his right wrist, left wrist, back, right knee, left ankle, allergic rhinitis, and pseudofolliculitis barbae disabilities.

The deciding factor: The initial disability ratings for the Veteran's painful left wrist scar, residual scars of the right knee, and other conditions are denied as there is insufficient evidence to warrant higher ratings based on current symptomatology.,There is a need for new examinations to determine the current severity of the Veteran’s right wrist, left wrist, back, right knee, left ankle, allergic rhinitis, and pseudofolliculitis barbae disabilities.

Claimed conditions
Allergic rhinitis, Back disability characterized as a strain of the thoracolumbar spine, Left ankle disability characterized as a left ankle sprain, Left wrist disability characterized as a ganglion cyst of the left wrist, status post-surgery, Painful left wrist scar post ganglion cyst removal, Pseudofolliculitis barbae with folliculitis of the bilateral legs, Residual linear scar of the left wrist, status post ganglion cyst removal, Residual scars of the right knee, status post-arthroscopy, Right knee disability characterized as a medial meniscus tear of the right knee, status post-surgery with benign broad-based osteochondroma/bony exostosis, Right wrist disability characterized as a ganglion cyst of the right wrist
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 12, 2019
Citation
19193339

Veterans Law Judge

B.T. KNOPE

Decisions by this judge: 1,948 · Granted: 29% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19193339.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.