Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran is granted a total rating due to individual unemployability prior to November 12, 2018.,The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for aneurysm and subarachnoid hemorrhage (stroke) is granted as the delay in treatment by VA caused his condition.,Service connection for an aneurysm and subarachnoid hemorrhage (stroke) is denied due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to service.,The Veteran's PTSD and diabetes are both remanded for additional examination and rating determination.,The Veteran's diabetes is also remanded for additional examination and rating determination.

The deciding factor: The Veteran was found unemployable prior to November 12, 2018 due to his service-connected disabilities. The delay in treatment by VA caused the aneurysm and subarachnoid hemorrhage (stroke).,The delay in treatment by VA caused the aneurysm and subarachnoid hemorrhage (stroke) which was misdiagnosed as headaches.,There is no evidence linking the Veteran's aneurysm and subarachnoid hemorrhage to service. The conditions are not related to his active duty.,The Veteran’s PTSD and diabetes have worsened since the last VA examination, warranting a new examination.,The Veteran’s diabetes has also worsened since the last VA examination, warranting a new examination.

Claimed conditions
Aneurysm, Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (Stroke)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 12, 2019
Citation
19193415

Veterans Law Judge

GAYLE STROMMEN

Decisions by this judge: 2,092 · Granted: 42% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19193415.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.