Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has remanded the issues of entitlement to service connection for venous insufficiency and headaches, as well as the issue of increased initial ratings for lumbar spine multilevel degenerative disc and joint disease with bilateral sacroiliac joint osteoarthritis, impairment of the left and right thighs, limitation of extension of the left and right thighs, and limitation of flexion of the left and right thighs; and entitlement to a TDIU.,The Veteran's appeal is remanded for further development including obtaining his Social Security Administration records and providing an addendum opinion regarding whether his headaches are at least as likely as not proximately due to his service-connected hypertension.

The deciding factor: The Board has determined that the issues of entitlement to service connection for venous insufficiency, headaches, increased initial ratings for lumbar spine multilevel degenerative disc and joint disease with bilateral sacroiliac joint osteoarthritis, impairment of the left and right thighs, limitation of extension of the left and right thighs, and limitation of flexion of the left and right thighs; and entitlement to a TDIU must be remanded due to procedural errors in the prior decision.

Claimed conditions
limitation of extension of the left thigh due to left hip degenerative arthritis, limitation of extension of the right thigh due to right hip degenerative arthritis, limitation of flexion of the left thigh due to left hip degenerative arthritis, limitation of flexion of the right thigh due to right hip degenerative arthritis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 12, 2019
Citation
19193539

Veterans Law Judge

MICHAEL MARTIN

Decisions by this judge: 2,188 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19193539.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.