The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's right hip and back pain were caused by VA treatment. The case will be returned for an appropriate medical evaluation.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for a medical opinion to determine if the Veteran's disability was caused by VA treatment, specifically due to carelessness or negligence.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Hip Replacement, Back Pain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 16, 2019
- Citation
- 19194157
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,604 · Granted: 65% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19194157.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional examinations and opinions to determine the severity of his service-connected right hip disability, scars, and DDD/IVDS of the thoracolumbar spine.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that new evidence, including private treatment records and a hearing transcript, warrants readjudicating the claim for service connection of a back pain disability. The Veteran's current condition is not related to his military service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's eligibility for PCAFC and whether it is in his best interest. The VA will need to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the Veteran's mental ability without supervision, as well as determine if C.N.B. is suitable as the primary caregiver.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran requires personal care services due to his psychiatric and musculoskeletal disorders, but further evaluation is needed to determine if participation in PCAFC is in his best interest. The AOJ must provide a new decision with proper notice.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.