The Veteran's claims for service connection for polycythemia rubra vera with deep vein thrombosis and eczematous dermatitis have been remanded due to the need for additional medical examination. The Board found that new evidence has raised a reasonable possibility of substantiating the claims, but further evaluation is needed.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's conditions may be related to in-service exposure or service, but this needs to be determined through medical examination and opinion.
- Claimed conditions
- polycythemia rubra vera, deep vein thrombosis, eczematous dermatitis
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 18, 2019
- Citation
- 19195020
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19195020.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on the need for aid and attendance is granted, as he requires regular assistance with dressing, keeping himself clean and presentable, and attending to his bodily needs due to service-connected disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection for a skin condition, to include eczematous dermatitis, hand dermatitis, chronic spongiotic dermatitis, and psoriasis vulgaris, due to an inadequate VA medical examination and opinions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for further development, including obtaining additional evidence and opinions to address whether the Veteran's claimed conditions are related to his service or VA treatment.
- Partly granted
The Board granted an increased initial rating of 40 percent for voiding dysfunction status post urinary tract cancer and denied an increased initial rating in excess of 30 percent for a left nephrectomy due to urinary tract cancer. The remaining service connection claims were remanded.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.