The Veteran's initial evaluation for left foot neuropathy is denied as it does not meet the criteria for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent.,An initial compensable evaluation for non-painful residual scars of the left lower extremity, right lower leg and foot, and chest is denied. The Veteran already has a rating for painful scars on his right lower leg and foot and left foot.,The Veteran's initial evaluation in excess of 20 percent for painful residual scars of the left lower extremity and right lower leg and foot is denied. There are no indications that he meets the criteria for an increased rating under Diagnostic Code 7804.,An evaluation in excess of 20 percent for posttraumatic arthritis of the right ankle is granted, subject to the laws and regulations governing the payment of VA benefits.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not support a higher evaluation as the Veteran's left foot neuropathy does not meet the criteria for severe or complete paralysis.,There are no indications that the non-painful scars warrant an increased rating, given their current classification and the fact that he is already compensated for painful ones.,The Veteran’s painful scars do not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation under Diagnostic Code 7804 as there are no indications of more than 5 or more scars with underlying tissue damage.,The right ankle arthritis meets the criteria for an evaluation in excess of 20 percent due to marked limited motion, but not ankylosis.
- Claimed conditions
- {"condition_name":"Left foot neuropathy"}, {"condition_name":"Non-painful residual scars of the left lower extremity, right lower leg and foot, and chest"}, {"condition_name":"Painful residual scars of the left lower extremity and right lower leg and foot"}, {"condition_name":"Posttraumatic arthritis of the right ankle"}
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 19, 2019
- Citation
- 19195555
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19195555.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, effective from the date of the February 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's current neck strain is related to his in-service activities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD due to an inadequate medical opinion.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for myasthenia gravis based on the Veteran's exposure to hazardous substances during his military service.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.