Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's initial evaluation for left foot neuropathy is denied as it does not meet the criteria for an evaluation in excess of 10 percent.,An initial compensable evaluation for non-painful residual scars of the left lower extremity, right lower leg and foot, and chest is denied. The Veteran already has a rating for painful scars on his right lower leg and foot and left foot.,The Veteran's initial evaluation in excess of 20 percent for painful residual scars of the left lower extremity and right lower leg and foot is denied. There are no indications that he meets the criteria for an increased rating under Diagnostic Code 7804.,An evaluation in excess of 20 percent for posttraumatic arthritis of the right ankle is granted, subject to the laws and regulations governing the payment of VA benefits.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not support a higher evaluation as the Veteran's left foot neuropathy does not meet the criteria for severe or complete paralysis.,There are no indications that the non-painful scars warrant an increased rating, given their current classification and the fact that he is already compensated for painful ones.,The Veteran’s painful scars do not meet the criteria for a higher evaluation under Diagnostic Code 7804 as there are no indications of more than 5 or more scars with underlying tissue damage.,The right ankle arthritis meets the criteria for an evaluation in excess of 20 percent due to marked limited motion, but not ankylosis.

Claimed conditions
Left foot neuropathy, Non-painful residual scars of the left lower extremity, right lower leg and foot, and chest, Painful residual scars of the left lower extremity and right lower leg and foot, Posttraumatic arthritis of the right ankle
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
December 19, 2019
Citation
19195555

Veterans Law Judge

JONATHAN B. KRAMER

Decisions by this judge: 2,035 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 19195555.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.