The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical evidence regarding the relationship between the Veteran's melanoma and his service-connected chloracne, as well as the issue of whether the Veteran's melanoma is related to in-service sun exposure. The Veteran will need to provide VA with any relevant treatment records and undergo a VA examination.
The deciding factor: The Board lacks sufficient medical evidence to determine if the Veteran’s melanoma may be related to his service-connected chloracne or due to in-service sun exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- melanoma
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 27, 2019
- Citation
- 19196388
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19196388.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that his lung cancer was related to his service-connected melanoma.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and obstructive sleep apnea based on toxic exposure risk activity (TERA) during the Veteran's service.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for melanoma under the PACT Act, presumptively linking it to the Veteran's exposure to burn pits during his deployment in Saudi Arabia.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for melanoma, left foot gout, and right foot gout as the evidence did not support a finding that these conditions were related to the Veteran's service, including his presumed exposure to Agent Orange.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.