Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for PTSD is remanded due to the need for VA treatment records and an examination.,The Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for residuals of a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) after July 2016 VA surgery is remanded due to the need for clarification on whether the CVA was caused by the surgery and if so, whether it was due to carelessness or negligence.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a CVA secondary to service-connected prostate cancer is remanded due to the need for an addendum opinion addressing causation of the CVA and ureter disability.,The Veteran's TDIU claim is remanded due to the need for consideration of his PTSD, CVA, and other disabilities.

The deciding factor: The Veteran has not provided sufficient evidence to establish a claim for an increased rating for PTSD prior to the issuance of VA treatment records and examination.,The Veteran's stroke may have been caused by preexisting factors but also due to carelessness or negligence on the part of VA. The need for clarification is required.,The causation of the CVA and ureter disability must be determined, including whether it was reasonably foreseeable as an ordinary risk of treatment.,The Veteran's TDIU claim requires consideration of his PTSD, CVA, and other disabilities.

Claimed conditions
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) due to service-connected prostate cancer, Erectile Dysfunction
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 27, 2019
Citation
19196538

Veterans Law Judge

M. SORISIO

Decisions by this judge: 1,680 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19196538.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.