The Veteran's knee braces and pain cream have caused wear and tear to his clothing, meeting the criteria for an annual clothing allowance in 2017.
The deciding factor: The VAMC found that the Veteran's knee braces had not been replaced since issuance and damage his clothes. The Board weighed this finding against the Veteran's lay assertions and determined the evidence was at least in equipoise.
- Claimed conditions
- knee disabilities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 27, 2019
- Citation
- 19196605
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,077 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 19196605.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's TDIU and DEA eligibility are granted with an effective date of April 1, 2009. The Board found that the Veteran's service-connected knee disabilities precluded him from securing or maintaining a substantially gainful occupation since April 2009.
- Granted
The Board has granted earlier effective dates of December 8, 2015 for both TDIU and DEA eligibility. The Veteran is now eligible for these benefits as his service-connected disabilities have prevented him from securing or maintaining substantially gainful employment.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for TDIU was denied because the Board found that he had substantially gainful employment during the period of the appeal, despite his service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Veteran's request for an extension of her delimiting date for Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits due to service-connected knee disabilities was denied because the evidence did not clearly establish that she was prevented from initiating or completing her chosen program of education.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.