Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Board denied service connection for diabetes mellitus type 2, right upper extremity and lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, left upper and lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, right CTS, and left CTS as there is no evidence of these conditions during or immediately after service.,The Board also denied service connection for TBI due to lack of current diagnosis and credible supporting evidence that the claimed in-service stressor occurred.,Service connection was not granted for a nervous condition (diagnosed as depression NOS and PTSD) because there is no indication of a current disability related to an in-service event or disease.

The deciding factor: The Veteran did not have any diagnosed conditions during service, and the evidence does not support a finding that these conditions began during service. The VA examinations found no current diagnoses for peripheral neuropathy, CTS, or TBI.,There is no credible supporting evidence of a head injury during service, and the VA examiners concluded there was no current diagnosis of TBI. The Veteran's stressor statement does not meet the DSM-IV criteria for PTSD as per a VA psychiatrist’s evaluation.,The Veteran had a personality disorder diagnosed during service that preexisted his entry into service. There is no indication of any other mental condition related to service, and the Board found no evidence supporting a current diagnosis of a nervous condition (PTSD) related to service.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus type 2, right upper extremity peripheral neuropathy, right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, left upper extremity peripheral neuropathy, left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, right carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), left CTS
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 2, 2020
Citation
20000228

Veterans Law Judge

RYAN T. KESSEL

Decisions by this judge: 2,199 · Granted: 25% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20000228.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.