The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development and consideration of whether acne conglobata should be rated separately from scleredema, as well as for extraschedular evaluation.
The deciding factor: The decision was based on the need for further evidence regarding the nature and severity of the Veteran's service-connected conditions and their impact on employment.
- Claimed conditions
- acne conglobata, scleredema
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- January 6, 2020
- Citation
- 20000550
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,614 · Granted: 35% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20000550.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an effective date earlier than January 30, 2015, for the grant of service connection for acne conglobata as there was no evidence of a formal or informal claim prior to that date.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for tinnitus and acne conglobata, finding that the Veteran's conditions began during military service.,Service connection was also granted for the aggravation of pre-existing acne conglobata by military service.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for annual VA clothing allowances due to use of skin medications and a manual wheelchair, finding that there was no evidence that these items damaged his outer garments.
- Denied
The Board found that the Veteran's claimed skin disorder, including acne conglobata, is not related to his military service and denied his claim for service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.