Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
GrantedPACT Act

Service connection for diabetes mellitus, type II is granted.,Service connection for neuropathy of the right lower extremity as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus is granted.,Service connection for neuropathy of the left lower extremity as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus is granted.,Service connection for nephropathy (kidney disease) as secondary to service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II is granted.,Service connection for colon cancer due to herbicide exposure is granted.,Service connection for hypertension due to herbicide exposure is granted.

The deciding factor: The Veteran served on active duty in close proximity to an area where herbicide agents were used during the Vietnam War, and his diabetes mellitus type II is presumed service-connected based on this exposure.,The Veteran's neuropathy of the right lower extremity is proximately due to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II.,The Veteran's neuropathy of the left lower extremity is proximately due to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II.,The Veteran's nephropathy (kidney disease) is proximately due to his service-connected diabetes mellitus, type II.,The Veteran had a resection of his large intestine due to colon cancer and the VA examiner opined that it was as likely as not related to service. The Veteran also has hypertension which may be associated with herbicide exposure based on recent NAS study findings.,The Veteran's skin condition on his hands is presumed to be related to herbicide exposure.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus, type II, neuropathy of the right lower extremity, neuropathy of the left lower extremity, nephropathy (kidney disease), colon cancer, hypertension
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 7, 2020
Citation
20001009

Veterans Law Judge

G. A. WASIK

Decisions by this judge: 1,886 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20001009.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.