Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's GERD is remanded for a VA examination to determine its etiology.,The Veteran’s hypertension, linked to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune, is remanded for a VA examination to determine its etiology.,The Veteran's left wrist disability, lumbar spine disability, and cervical spine disability are remanded for a VA examination to determine their etiology.,The Veteran's prostate cancer, potentially linked to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune, is remanded for a VA examination to determine its etiology. If service-connected, the bladder incontinence is also remanded for a VA examination to determine its etiology.,Prostate cancer may be secondary to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune and/or prostate cancer.

The deciding factor: There is insufficient evidence of record to properly adjudicate these claims, including the need for additional treatment records and consideration of occupational exposures.,The Veteran's hypertension was linked to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune. There are no definitive studies linking this exposure to his condition.,The Veteran’s left wrist, lumbar spine, and cervical spine disabilities may be related to repetitive motion as a cook during service.,Prostate cancer is potentially linked to prolonged occupational exposure for at least five years and/or repeated exposure to contaminated water. Bladder incontinence is also remanded if prostate cancer is found to be service-connected.,The Veteran's prostate cancer may be secondary to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune and/or prostate cancer.

Claimed conditions
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Hypertension, Left wrist disability, Lumbar spine disability, Cervical spine disability, Prostate cancer, Bladder incontinence
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 7, 2020
Citation
20001215

Veterans Law Judge

MICHELLE P. KATZ

Decisions by this judge: 112 · Granted: 20% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20001215.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.