Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's bilateral hallux valgus is not severe enough to warrant a compensable rating.,The Veteran's left shoulder strain does not meet the criteria for a higher than 20 percent rating.,The Veteran's reactive airway disease (RAD) does not meet the criteria for a higher than 10 percent rating.,The Veteran's eczema, groin cyst, and tinea cruris do not meet the criteria for a higher than 10 percent rating.

The deciding factor: The Veteran’s bilateral hallux valgus does not equate to amputation of the great toe or have been operated on with resection of the metatarsal head.,The Veteran's left shoulder strain has manifested as no worse than flexion to 180 degrees, abduction to 160 degrees, external rotation to 90 degrees, and internal rotation to 70 degrees, with further limitation during a flare-up due to pain and weakness. No higher rating is warranted.,The Veteran's reactive airway disease (RAD) manifests in pre-bronchodilator pulmonary function testing results of no less than 78 percent of Forced Expiratory Volume in one second/Forced Vital Capacity (FEV-1/FVC). The Veteran does not use oral or parenteral medications, to include corticosteroids and bronchodilators. No higher rating is warranted.,The Veteran's eczema, groin cyst, and tinea cruris have manifested by coverage of 5 to 20 percent of his total skin requiring the use of topical medication to the affected areas but no worse.

Claimed conditions
bilateral hallux valgus, left shoulder strain, reactive airway disease (RAD), eczema, groin cyst, and tinea cruris
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
January 10, 2020
Citation
20002530

Veterans Law Judge

KEITH W. ALLEN

Decisions by this judge: 2,669 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20002530.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.