Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's appeal for an effective date prior to October 25, 2011 for the award of service connection for tinnitus has been dismissed. The claim for service connection for a left shoulder disorder is remanded due to new and material evidence having been received.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for a left shoulder disorder is reopened based on additional VA treatment records showing X-ray evidence of degenerative changes and a diagnosis of rotator cuff disorder, which may be related to the in-service injury. The claim for service connection for a left hand disorder (secondary to a left shoulder disorder) and an acquired psychiatric disorder (including PTSD and depression) are also remanded.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for asthma is remanded due to his failure to report for a VA examination.

The deciding factor: The effective date prior to October 25, 2011 for the award of service connection for tinnitus has been dismissed as the Veteran withdrew his appeal.,New and material evidence has been received that may relate to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim of entitlement to service connection for a left shoulder disorder. The claim is therefore reopened.,The Veteran's in-service injury, documented in October 2007, may be related to his current left shoulder and hand disorders. However, further examination is needed to determine the nature and etiology of these conditions.,The Veteran's combat service in Iraq may be related to his acquired psychiatric disorder (including PTSD and depression). Further examination is needed to determine the nature and etiology of this condition.,The Veteran's asthma may have pre-existed his second period of active duty. A VA examination is needed to determine whether it was aggravated by his deployment to Iraq.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus, left shoulder disorder, left hand disorder, acquired psychiatric disorder (including PTSD and depression), asthma
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 16, 2020
Citation
20004112

Veterans Law Judge

A. JAEGER

Decisions by this judge: 1,676 · Granted: 24% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20004112.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.