The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical evidence regarding whether the Veteran's testicular disability is related to his military service, specifically testicular torsion surgery. The Veteran needs a VA examination to determine if his current testicular disability is at least as likely as not caused by or related to his in-service injury.
The deciding factor: The Board cannot make a fully-informed decision without an opinion from a medical professional regarding the relationship between the Veteran's service-connected condition and his current symptoms.
- Claimed conditions
- testicular disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 23, 2020
- Citation
- 20004494
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,812 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20004494.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's testicular disability and headaches from October 30, 2020 are granted. The testicular disability is service-connected due to in-service onset during active duty. The headaches receive a 30 percent rating effective from October 30, 2020.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a disability manifested by loss of hair on the arms and legs and for a testicular disability, finding that there was no current diagnosis of these conditions and thus not meeting the cornerstone element of service connection.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for a skin disability, to include dermatitis and tinea, and a testicular disability. The claim for obstructive sleep apnea was remanded.
- Partly granted
The Board dismissed the claims for service connection for a bladder/bowel control disability and testicular disability as they were already granted. The claim for exposure to burn pits and toxic equipment fires was denied, while other claims were remanded for further consideration.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.