Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claims to reopen are being remanded due to the need for additional VA treatment records and a new examination.,The Veteran's claim of service connection for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome is also being remanded as it may be related to his lumbar spine disability.,The Veteran's major depressive disorder is being remanded because more recent treatment records are needed, and a new examination is required due to the severity of his condition.,The Veteran's multilevel lumbar disc disease is being remanded for a new examination as it may have worsened since the last evaluation.,The Veteran's cervical spine disability is being remanded because an opinion on whether it is related to service-connected lumbar spine disability is needed.,The Veteran's bilateral hip and knee disabilities are also being remanded due to the need for medical opinions regarding their relationship to his service-connected lumbar spine disability.,The Veteran's right ankle disability is being remanded as a new examination is required, including an assessment of whether it is related to his in-service injury.,The Veteran's bilateral tarsal tunnel syndrome and lower extremity numbness are also being remanded for medical opinions on their relationship to service-connected lumbar spine disability.,The Veteran's TDIU claim is being remanded as more detailed information regarding the impact of his disabilities on his employment is needed.

The deciding factor: Additional VA treatment records and a new examination are required due to the need for updated medical evidence and an assessment of the current severity of the Veteran's conditions.,The claim of service connection for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome may be related to his lumbar spine disability, so further evaluation is needed.,More recent treatment records are necessary to determine if the Veteran’s condition has worsened since the last examination. A new examination is also required as the current evidence does not provide sufficient information on the severity of his major depressive disorder.,The multilevel lumbar disc disease may have worsened, so a new examination is needed to assess its current status and determine if it is related to service-connected disability.,An opinion is needed regarding whether the Veteran's cervical spine disability is related to his service-connected lumbar spine disability. The current evidence does not provide sufficient information on this issue.,The bilateral hip and knee disabilities may be related to his service-connected lumbar spine disability, so a medical opinion is required to determine their relationship.,A new examination is needed to assess the Veteran's right ankle disability and whether it is related to his in-service injury. The current evidence does not provide sufficient information on this issue.,The bilateral tarsal tunnel syndrome and lower extremity numbness may be related to service-connected lumbar spine disability, so a medical opinion is required to determine their relationship.,More detailed information regarding the impact of the Veteran's disabilities on his employment is needed for the TDIU claim.

Claimed conditions
left Achilles tendinitis, residual left ankle sprain, bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, cervical spine disability, bilateral hip disability, bilateral knee disability, right ankle disability, bilateral tarsal tunnel syndrome (claimed as lower extremity neuropathy), lower extremity numbness
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 28, 2020
Citation
20006395

Veterans Law Judge

M.E. LARKIN

Decisions by this judge: 2,084 · Granted: 20% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20006395.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.