Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's IBS is granted a 30 percent rating.,Service connection for COPD and sleep disability are remanded due to insufficient evidence.,Joint pain of ankles, knees, lower legs, shoulders, arms, and wrists are remanded due to insufficient evidence.,GERD and erectile dysfunction are remanded due to insufficient evidence.,No effective date provided as the decision is for appeal purposes only.

The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran's IBS symptoms have been severe with frequent episodes of bowel disturbances, warranting a 30 percent rating during the entire appeal period.,Insufficient evidence to determine if COPD and sleep disability are related to service or other qualifying conditions. Remand is necessary for addendum opinions addressing these questions.,Insufficient evidence to determine if joint pain is due to service or known clinical diagnoses. Remand is necessary for addendum opinions addressing these questions.,Insufficient evidence to determine if GERD and erectile dysfunction are related to service, PTSD, or medications prescribed for PTSD. Remand is necessary for addendum opinions addressing these questions.,No effective date provided as the decision is for appeal purposes only.

Claimed conditions
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Sleep Disability, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Erectile Dysfunction, Joint Pain of Ankles, Knees, Lower Legs, Shoulders, Arms, and Wrists
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 28, 2020
Citation
20007162

Veterans Law Judge

Bethany L. Buck

Decisions by this judge: 2,088 · Granted: 33% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20007162.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.