The Board has remanded the case for further adjudication due to procedural issues and additional development of evidence.
The deciding factor: The decision was appealed to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (CAVC), which granted a Joint Motion for Remand (JMR) that required the Board to address whether the issue of entitlement to TDIU had been raised in light of the March 2018 VA examiner report and the Veteran's statements regarding his disability.
- Claimed conditions
- stress fracture of the left tibia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 28, 2020
- Citation
- 20007314
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,828 · Granted: 32% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20007314.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's initial compensable rating for service-connected stress fracture residuals of the left tibia was denied from August 28, 2014 to October 15, 2020. From January 1, 2018 onwards, a separate 10 percent rating for instability of the left knee associated with the service-connected stress fracture residuals of the left tibia was granted.
- Denied
The Board denied increased ratings for stress fractures of the right and left tibia, as well as a separate rating for vision impairment related to a scar on the Veteran's right eye. The evidence did not support higher disability ratings due to lack of unresponsiveness to treatment or surgery.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for additional development due to incomplete records and inadequate VA examination. The Veteran is required to provide releases for private treatment records, including those from Drs. P., F., J., K.E., M.D., and L.B., M.D. A new VA examination must be conducted to assess the current severity of his right knee and bilateral tibia disorders.
- Granted
The Veteran's stress fracture of the left tibia is rated at 30 percent effective April 10, 2014. The Board also granted a TDIU based on his service-connected disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.