Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for lumbosacral strain has been reopened, and the Board finds that his lumbar spine internal disc derangement is related to his service-connected conditions. The issues of residuals from stress fractures to bilateral tibia and metatarsals, initial rating for service-connected bilateral feet conditions, ratings in excess of 20 percent for service-connected residuals of stress fracture of the right proximal femur with right hip flexor strain and left proximal femur with left hip flexor strain, and TDIU are remanded.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's lumbar spine internal disc derangement is related to his service-connected conditions, including his bilateral feet conditions and stress fractures. The issues of residuals from stress fractures to bilateral tibia and metatarsals, initial rating for service-connected bilateral feet conditions, ratings in excess of 20 percent for service-connected residuals of stress fracture of the right proximal femur with right hip flexor strain and left proximal femur with left hip flexor strain, and TDIU are remanded to allow for further development.

Claimed conditions
lumbosacral strain, lumbar spine internal disc derangement, stress fracture to left tibia, stress fracture to right tibia, stress fracture to right ankle, stress fracture to left ankle, residuals from stress fracture to left cortical third and fourth metatarsal, bilateral feet conditions (including claw foot with metatarsalgia, hallux valgus, hammer toes, and degenerative joint disease of the bilateral feet), residuals of stress fracture of right proximal femur with right hip flexor strain, residuals of stress fracture to left proximal femur with left hip flexor strain
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 5, 2020
Citation
20009732

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20009732.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.