Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and development of records.,The Veteran is seeking a higher rating for his knee conditions, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, lumbar spine disorder, thoracic spine disorder, cervical spine disorder, neurological deficits, carpal tunnel syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea, and acquired psychiatric disorder.

The deciding factor: Additional examinations are needed to assess the severity of the Veteran's knee conditions, as well as his diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, lumbar spine disorder, thoracic spine disorder, cervical spine disorder, neurological deficits, carpal tunnel syndrome, obstructive sleep apnea, and acquired psychiatric disorder. The Veteran also needs to provide evidence of any in-service herbicide exposure for service connection claims.,The Board acknowledges that the Veteran has submitted some VA and private treatment records but notes that additional examinations are needed to ensure a complete record is available for proper adjudication.

Claimed conditions
residuals of meniscectomy, left knee, residuals of enlarged tibial tubercle, right knee, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, lumbar spine disorder, thoracic spine disorder, cervical spine disorder, neurological deficits, fecal incontinence, and/or urinary incontinence due to spine disorder, carpal tunnel syndrome, right wrist, carpal tunnel syndrome, left wrist, obstructive sleep apnea (previously claimed as sleep disorder), acquired psychiatric disorder (including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression)
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 13, 2020
Citation
20012043

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20012043.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.