The Board has remanded the case due to the need for an examination to determine if the Veteran's current facial condition, including paresthesia, is related to his in-service dental extraction.
The deciding factor: The claim was denied because there was no current disability. The examiner will assess whether any identified facial disability had its clinical onset during service or is due to an event or incident of the Veteran’s period of active service.
- Claimed conditions
- facial condition, paresthesia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 21, 2020
- Citation
- 20013650
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20013650.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for paresthesia and chronic constipation due to inadequate VA examination reports and opinions. The AOJ will obtain new examinations and medical opinions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a duty to assist error and requires additional opinions regarding secondary service connection and direct service connection.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for earlier effective dates and increased ratings have been denied.,The Veteran's claim for SMC based on the need for aid and attendance of another is remanded due to inextricably intertwined issues.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's claim for a revision of the April 1997 rating decision due to new and material evidence being submitted within one year of the decision. The Board also granted service connection for residuals of stroke, finding that her condition is related to an in-service assault.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.