The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's exposure to asbestos and the nature of his lung disorders. The case will be returned for further investigation and examination.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on a lack of sufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's exposure to asbestos in service, which is necessary to determine if any identified lung disorder was caused by service.
- Claimed conditions
- pulmonary disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 27, 2020
- Citation
- 20014798
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20014798.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted service connection for bilateral hearing loss but has remanded the issue of service connection for a pulmonary disorder due to lack of sufficient medical opinion.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for a pulmonary disorder, lumbar spine disorder, and right knee disorder as the evidence did not support the presence of current disabilities related to the Veteran's active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for pulmonary disorder and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for osteopenia due to a need for additional evidence.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for a pulmonary disorder, initially claimed as esophageal cancer, due to the evidence not supporting a finding that these conditions began during active service or are otherwise related to an in-service injury or disease.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.