The Board has decided to remand the case due to a lack of a VA examination prior to the initial decision, and it is unclear whether the Veteran currently has a hepatitis disorder or any related residuals. The claim must be returned for further evaluation.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was insufficient evidence regarding the current status of the Veteran's hepatitis disorder and its relationship to service.
- Claimed conditions
- infectious hepatitis, residuals of a hepatitis disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 29, 2020
- Citation
- A20016220
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for SMC based on aid and attendance or housebound rate due to insufficient evidence showing he requires regular aid and assistance from another person.
- Denied
The VA has denied an increased evaluation for the veteran's infectious hepatitis, currently rated at 30 percent.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for obstructive sleep apnea, effective from the date of the February 2025 rating decision.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a medical examination to determine if the Veteran's current neck strain is related to his in-service activities.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.