The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date and increased evaluation for renal dysfunction was denied. The Veteran did not have persistent edema, albuminuria, or decreased kidney function warranting a higher rating.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence showed no persistent edema, albuminuria, or decreased kidney function warranting a higher rating.
- Claimed conditions
- renal dysfunction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 30, 2020
- Citation
- A20016300
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,456 · Granted: 23% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A20016300.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claim for service connection for erectile dysfunction is granted. The claims for increased ratings for prostate cancer and voiding dysfunction, as well as the TDIU and renal dysfunction claims are remanded due to pre-decisional duty to assist error.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a genitourinary disorder and sleep apnea are being remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and consideration of intermediate steps.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension, diabetes, diabetic nephropathy, renal dysfunction, and erectile dysfunction as secondary to the Veteran's now service-connected diabetes. The issue of service connection for chronic kidney disease (CKD) is remanded due to a reasonable possibility that development could substantiate the claim.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board granted the restoration of separate service connection for renal dysfunction and the restoration of entitlement to special monthly compensation (SMC) benefits.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.