The Veteran's claim for service connection for an eye disorder other than pseudophakia, dry eye syndrome and monovision has been remanded due to the submission of new evidence. The Board finds that there is a need for further examination and opinion regarding his claimed bilateral ischemic optic neuropathy.
The deciding factor: New evidence was submitted after the final rating decision, warranting readjudication of the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- Ischemic optic neuropathy, Subconjunctival hemorrhage
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 5, 2020
- Citation
- A20016571
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A20016571.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's left eye condition, diagnosed as ischemic optic neuropathy, is related to his service-connected hypertension and grants entitlement to service connection for this condition.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's eye disability, colon cancer, and lung disability are remanded for further examination to determine if they are related to service exposure to herbicide agents.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for specially adapted housing and/or a special home adaptation grant is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including a new VA examination.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for an increased level of SMC based on the need for a higher level of A&A, as he does not have anatomical loss or use of any extremity that would warrant such a rate.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.