The Veteran's appeal for an earlier effective date for payment of additional compensation for his spouse was denied. The earliest possible effective date is June 1, 2019, as that is the date VA received a written claim for this benefit and notice of the marriage.
The deciding factor: VA did not receive a written claim for additional dependency compensation for D.L.T. within a year of the Veteran's marriage or notification of his disability rating, making June 1, 2019, the earliest possible effective date.
- Claimed conditions
- chronic bursitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 9, 2020
- Citation
- A20016627
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A20016627.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including obtaining updated VA treatment records and preparing an addendum opinion from a physician regarding the etiology of the Veteran's left hip disability. The claim will be reconsidered based on the additional evidence.
- Denied
The Board found that the veteran's right hip disability, which includes chronic bursitis and osteoarthritis, is currently rated at 30 percent under DCs 5019-5252. The RO has not provided a higher rating for this condition.
- Granted
The Board has found that the veteran's current right and left shoulder disabilities of chronic bursitis with osteoarthritis are etiologically related to in-service bilateral shoulder injury, thus granting service connection for these conditions.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.