The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a right eye disability, including early cataracts and peripheral corneal opacity, finding no nexus between these conditions and his military service.
The deciding factor: There is no competent evidence of a nexus between the post-service diagnoses of early cataracts and peripheral corneal opacity and the Veteran's service, specifically the incident involving getting spray paint in his eyes during service.
- Claimed conditions
- early cataracts, peripheral corneal opacity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 17, 2020
- Citation
- A20017091
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A20017091.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's sarcoidosis is rated based on bronchitis, but he asserts the severity of his rating does not accurately reflect the severity of his symptomology. The Board finds that additional VA examination and medical opinion are needed to determine if an increased rating is warranted.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board dismissed all claims due to the death of the appellant, as it has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of these appeals at this time.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's service treatment records indicate he had traumatic iritis in 1976, which resolved without complication. However, the current eye conditions are not related to his service. The Board finds that an additional VA etiology opinion should be obtained.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for further development and consideration of his claims, including entitlement to a rating in excess of 40 percent for postoperative chorioretinitis and early cataracts, as well as TDIU prior to August 23, 2016.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.