Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Board has dismissed the Veteran's appeals for increased ratings and service connection claims due to a failure to file timely notices of disagreement within one year of notification letters.

The deciding factor: The Veteran did not submit a valid Notice of Disagreement (NOD) within the required timeframe, leading to the dismissal of his appeals under both the legacy and modernized review systems.

Claimed conditions
painful scar, residual of left inguinal hernia surgery, scar, residual of left inguinal hernia surgery
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
November 24, 2020
Citation
A20017448

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A20017448.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.