Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Veteran's claim for service connection for coronary artery disease, including as due to herbicide agent exposure, was dismissed because the Veteran did not timely file a Notice of Disagreement with the February 2019 rating decision.

The deciding factor: The Veteran did not submit a Notice of Disagreement within one year of notification of the AMA rating decision, which is required for appeal to the Board under the AMA.

Claimed conditions
coronary artery disease (CAD)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
December 14, 2020
Citation
A20018483

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A20018483.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.