The Board has determined that additional development is needed to determine the nature and etiology of any cold weather injuries affecting the Veteran's upper and lower extremities, including his hands and feet. The case is being remanded for a VA examination.
The deciding factor: The Veteran served in North Dakota where he worked outside in maintenance and repair during temperatures as low as 25 to 30 degrees below zero, which may have caused cold weather injuries to his upper and lower extremities.
- Claimed conditions
- cold weather injury to the right upper extremity, cold weather injury to the left upper extremity, cold weather injury to the right lower extremity, cold weather injury to the left lower extremity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 17, 2020
- Citation
- 20019762
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20019762.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided that a VA examination is needed to determine the nature and likely etiology of the Veteran's claimed cold weather injury to the right upper extremity.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeals regarding the issues of service connection for cold weather injuries to the right lower extremity, left lower extremity and ears.
- Denied
The Board has denied the veteran's claims for service connection for hypertension, anxiety, an eye disorder, a cold weather injury of the left lower extremity, and a stomach condition. The reasons include lack of evidence linking these conditions to service or post-service onset.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.