Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision 20020590

The deciding factor: The VA examiner opined that the Veteran’s hypertension and erectile dysfunction were at least as likely as not due to his diabetes mellitus, which is a service-connected condition.

Claimed conditions
hypertension, erectile dysfunction
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
100%
Decision date
March 20, 2020
Citation
20020590

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20020590.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.