Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly grantedPACT Act

New and material evidence has been added to the record for a cervical spine disability claim. The Veteran's service-connected PTSD may be causing his migraine headaches.,The Veteran's jaw disability claim is denied as no new or material evidence was submitted. No current diagnosis of a jaw disability was found in the records.,A TDIU request for the period prior to June 1, 2016 is moot due to the Veteran receiving a 100% evaluation for his service-connected PTSD beginning on that date.,The Veteran's skin condition claim is remanded as VA has not yet determined if it is related to Agent Orange exposure or an in-service injury.,A cervical spine disability claim is remanded as VA needs to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's neck pain, including whether it is related to service-connected PTSD or a burn pit injury.,The Veteran's skin condition claim is remanded for similar reasons.

The deciding factor: New evidence has been added that relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the cervical spine disability claim (current diagnosis of neck pain).,No new or material evidence was submitted regarding a current diagnosis of jaw disability.,The Veteran's PTSD is already rated at 100% and therefore renders moot his request for TDIU prior to June 1, 2016.,VA needs to determine if the Veteran's skin condition is related to Agent Orange exposure or an in-service injury.,VA needs to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's cervical spine disability, including whether it is related to service-connected PTSD or a burn pit injury.,VA needs to determine the nature and etiology of the Veteran's skin condition, including if it is related to Agent Orange exposure or an in-service injury.

Claimed conditions
cervical spine disability, jaw disability, migraine headaches, skin condition
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 23, 2020
Citation
20020946

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20020946.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.