The Board denied the Veteran's claim for SMC based on the need for aid and attendance and/or housebound status due to his service-connected disabilities, finding that the preponderance of evidence did not support a finding that he required regular care or was permanently housebound solely as a result of these conditions.
The deciding factor: The Board found inconsistent statements from the Veteran regarding his level of disability and use of assistive devices, which reduced the probative value of his assertion. Additionally, there was no evidence to suggest that the Veteran was permanently housebound due to his service-connected disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- Thigh muscle injury, Paralysis of the external popliteal nerve, Buttocks injury
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 25, 2020
- Citation
- 20021391
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20021391.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The appeal for a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss disability and service connection for paralysis of the external popliteal nerve was withdrawn by the Veteran's representative.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities have rendered him unable to care for his daily needs and protect himself from hazards, warranting special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance. However, he does not meet the criteria for housebound status.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities did not substantially contribute to his employment impairment and he had the education and transferable skills necessary to maintain employment within his field of interest, aptitudes, and abilities. Therefore, he was not found to have an employment handicap.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran is seeking payment or reimbursement for unauthorized medical services provided at Maine Medical Center from May 4, 2007 to May 10, 2007. The VA denied the claim due to the Veteran refusing transfer to a VA facility and because VA regulations precluded payment for treatment procured through private sources in preference to available Government facilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.