Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Whole decision: Denied

The Veteran's claim for service connection for diabetes mellitus, Type II was reopened but denied due to lack of new and material evidence.,Service connection for left lower extremity neuropathy, left upper extremity neuropathy, right lower extremity neuropathy, and right upper extremity neuropathy were all denied as the Veteran did not have a current diagnosis related to active service.,The Veteran's sleep apnea was denied because there is no evidence of its onset during or shortly after service.,Service connection for hypertension was denied due to lack of in-service diagnosis and no increase in disability during service.,Service connection for pressure in eyes was denied as the condition did not exist at the time of entrance into service.

The deciding factor: The evidence submitted since the January 2010 denial is cumulative or redundant, and does not relate to unestablished facts necessary to substantiate the claim.,The Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of neuropathy related to active service, nor did he have symptoms during service that could be linked to his current condition.,There is no evidence linking sleep apnea to service. The Veteran's STRs do not indicate any complaints or diagnoses of sleep apnea during service.,The Veteran does not have a diagnosed hypertension at the time of entrance into service, and there is no increase in disability during service that could be linked to his current condition.,There was no pre-existing condition of pressure in eyes noted at the time of entrance into service.

Claimed conditions
diabetes mellitus, Type II, left lower extremity neuropathy, left upper extremity neuropathy, right lower extremity neuropathy, right upper extremity neuropathy, sleep apnea, hypertension, pressure in eyes
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating
Not verified here — check the original decision
Decision date
March 26, 2020
Citation
20021705

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20021705.

What this means for you

A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.

What you can do next

Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.