The Veteran's umbilical hernia was noted at entrance to service and preexisted service. It is not considered aggravated by service.,The Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of hypertension that began during or within one year after his separation from service. The evidence does not support a finding of continuous symptomatology associated with the disability.,Service connection for dizziness (presumed to be related to a peripheral vestibular disorder) is denied as there is no in-service injury, event, or disease and no current diagnosis. The Veteran's dizziness has been presumed based on continuity of symptoms since service.,The Veteran does not have a current diagnosis of sinusitis that began during or within one year after his separation from service. There is no evidence of an in-service injury, event, or disease.
The deciding factor: There was no increase in the severity of the pre-existing umbilical hernia during service.,The Veteran's hypertension did not manifest during or within one year after his separation from service and there is no continuous symptomatology associated with it.,Service connection for dizziness cannot be established as there is no in-service injury, event, or disease and no current diagnosis. The presumption of continuity of symptoms since service does not apply due to the lack of a specific in-service injury, event, or disease.,The Veteran's sinusitis was not noted during service and there is no evidence of an in-service injury, event, or disease.
- Claimed conditions
- umbilical hernia, hypertension, dizziness (presumed to be related to a peripheral vestibular disorder), sinusitis
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 1, 2020
- Citation
- 20022649
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20022649.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension and peripheral neuropathy of the bilateral upper and lower extremities due to insufficient medical opinions regarding their etiology.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional development, including VA examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for additional development due to conflicting opinions regarding service connection for peripheral neuropathy, hypertension, and skin disabilities related to herbicide exposure.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension and increased rating for anxiety disorder have been denied. The Board found that there is no evidence of a current disability meeting the criteria for hypertension, and the Veteran's anxiety disorder does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.