The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for additional examinations and evaluations of her service-connected conditions, as well as a determination regarding her bilateral carpel tunnel syndrome.
The deciding factor: The Veteran has provided evidence that her service-connected conditions have worsened since her last examination. The Board finds that a new examination is necessary to determine the current severity of these conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- Restrictive lung disease, Status post fracture of the right 4th finger, Scars, status post excision of cysts of bilateral breasts, Left cheek scar, status post cyst excision, Bilateral degenerative joint disease of the feet, Transient paresthesias of the right foot, Transient paresthesias of the left foot, Bilateral carpel tunnel syndrome
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 2, 2020
- Citation
- 20023012
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20023012.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeals for service connection of left shoulder, left sinus tarsi syndrome disorder, right sinus tarsi syndrome disorder, left ankle condition and right ankle condition.,Service connection was granted for restrictive lung disease, lumbosacral strain condition, left knee condition, right knee condition, bilateral metatarsalgia condition and bilateral plantar fasciitis condition.
- Granted
The Veteran's September 4, 2024 HLR request was improperly rejected by the AOJ. The Board finds that the request is timely and valid, and reinstates the claims for earlier effective dates and increased ratings.
- Granted
The Board found that the original grant of service connection for restrictive lung disease was not clearly and unmistakably erroneous, thus granting restoration of service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to an inadequate VA examination, and a new examination is needed to determine if the Veteran's respiratory disability, including COPD and restrictive lung disease, is related to his active service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.