The Board has remanded the issues of entitlement to service connection for left tibial fracture, dental avulsion of tooth number 9 (left upper central incisor), increased ratings for related conditions, and special monthly compensation by reason of need for aid and attendance or permanent housebound status. The appeal is also referred to the AOJ for adjudication regarding the issues of entitlement to service connection for left leg genu varum and left leg tendonitis.
The deciding factor: The July 2016 VA examiner's opinion was found to be speculative, leading to remand of this issue.
- Claimed conditions
- Left thumb disability, Dental avulsion of tooth number 9 (left upper central incisor)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 6, 2020
- Citation
- 20023392
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20023392.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's hair loss and some other conditions are granted service connection, while the right hand disability is denied. The Veteran also has a new rating for his low back condition.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased rating of insomnia disorder, service connection for left thumb disability, and service connection for OSA have all been denied as the Veteran failed to appear for necessary VA examinations without good cause.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's initial claim for a compensable rating for left small finger laceration was denied. The Board has now remanded the case to assign an appropriate rating due to the need for further examination and consideration of new evidence.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Board dismissed the claims for service connection for various disabilities, including bilateral hearing loss, right knee, right hand, left knee, right ankle, and residuals of a traumatic brain injury due to untimely appeals or lack of evidence supporting current disability.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.