The Veteran's request to reopen his claims for service connection for chronic neurological disorders and urological/reproductive conditions due to exposure to ionizing radiation, asbestos, and lead and/or magnetic fields is granted. The issues are remanded for further development.
The deciding factor: New evidence submitted by the Veteran has been found to be new and material, allowing his claims to be reopened.
- Claimed conditions
- neurotics, dystonia, nerve palsy, urological/reproductive & uro/infertility
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- April 8, 2020
- Citation
- 20024174
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20024174.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to insufficient opinions regarding aggravation and secondary service connection. The Veteran's back disability may be aggravated by his service-connected diabetic neuropathy, right hand cramps are related to toxic exposure risk activities, and dystonia is related to herbicide agent exposure in service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for special monthly compensation based on aid and attendance for his spouse, finding that she did not meet the criteria set forth in 38 C.F.R. § 3.352(a) due to her ability to leave the house with assistance.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal has been dismissed due to their death during the pendency of the appeal.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's dystonia and restless leg syndrome are service-connected. However, due to a lack of VA examination for sleep apnea prior to the November 2019 SOC, the claim is being remanded for further evaluation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.