The Board has remanded the claims for diabetic nephrology, erectile dysfunction secondary to diabetes, and eye condition secondary to diabetes due to insufficient reasons provided in the original decision. The Veteran's fatigue related to his diabetic nephrology is also being reviewed, as well as a psychiatric examination and an assessment of whether he has an eye condition or erectile dysfunction disability.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the original decision did not adequately discuss the evidence regarding the Veteran’s service-connected conditions and their impact on his disabilities.
- Claimed conditions
- diabetic nephrology, erectile dysfunction secondary to service-connected type II diabetes mellitus, eye condition secondary to service-connected type II diabetes mellitus
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 8, 2020
- Citation
- 20024257
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20024257.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's diabetic nephrology does not meet the criteria for a rating in excess of 60 percent, as it does not result in persistent edema, creatinine at or above 4 mg%, BUN greater than 80 mg%, markedly decreased function of kidney or other organ systems, or need for regular dialysis. The Veteran's condition is currently rated at 60 percent.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.