The Veteran's pelvic adhesions and scar, residual of laparoscopy, are currently rated as noncompensably disabling. The Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted for either condition.,The Veteran contends she should be granted a compensable disability rating for her scar, residual of laparoscopy. However, the November 2019 VA examination did not adequately address whether the Veteran's scars are painful or unstable.
The deciding factor: The November 2019 VA examination report is inadequate as it does not provide sufficient information regarding the severity and frequency of flare-ups for a determination on functional loss.
- Claimed conditions
- Pelvic Adhesions, Scar, Residual of Laparoscopy
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 15, 2020
- Citation
- 20026035
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20026035.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected pelvic adhesions have been found to require continuous treatment, warranting a 10 percent evaluation.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected uterine fibroids, status post hysterectomy, do not warrant a rating in excess of 30 percent.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.