The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for soft palate cancer and its residuals due to a lack of adequate medical evidence addressing the relationship between his conditions and service, including presumed exposure to herbicide agents. The Veteran is required to provide updated VA treatment records and undergo a VA examination.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there was insufficient competent medical evidence to determine whether the Veteran's soft palate cancer and its residuals are related to service, particularly due to presumed exposure to herbicide agents.
- Claimed conditions
- soft palate cancer, residuals of soft palate cancer
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 5, 2020
- Citation
- 20031424
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20031424.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the Veteran's claims for service connection due to his death.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for soft palate cancer and a compensable initial rating for bilateral hearing loss prior to September 24, 2018. However, as of September 24, 2018, the Veteran was granted a 20% rating for his bilateral hearing loss.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death, and no service connection decision could be made.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.