The Board has remanded the claims for residuals of a back injury, skin disability, and lung disability due to lack of substantial compliance with previous remand directives. The decision on these issues remains pending.
The deciding factor: The VA examiners did not address all aspects of the Board's remand questions or consider the relevant evidence provided by the Veteran.
- Claimed conditions
- Loss of Vision, Residuals of a Back Injury, Skin Disability, Lung Disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 8, 2020
- Citation
- 20032475
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20032475.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board has readjudicated the claims for service connection for PTSD, bilateral hearing loss disability, cervical spine disability, skin disability, and peripheral neuropathy of both upper extremities. The decision is mixed as some issues are granted while others are remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate TERA opinion and requests an addendum opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's vision disorder, specifically addressing his conceded exposure to fuel contaminants in ground water.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the appellant's lung disability claim must be remanded to provide an adequate medical examination and opinion.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for various disabilities and denied higher ratings for several service-connected conditions.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.