The Veteran's coronary artery disease has not met the criteria for a rating in excess of 10 percent since December 2010.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not show that the service-connected cardiac disorder was limiting the Veteran’s workload to 7 METs or less resulting in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness or syncope due to CAD, and fails to show that the Veteran has had cardiac hypertrophy or cardiac dilation.
- Claimed conditions
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) status post myocardial infarction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 13, 2020
- Citation
- 20033258
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20033258.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to a procedural error in the VA examination, which did not consider his heart condition prior to January 7, 2026. The Board requires a retrospective opinion from an appropriate clinician regarding the severity of his CAD s/p myocardial infarction.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded due to the need for a new VA examination to determine the current level of severity of his coronary artery disease, as the November 2024 VA examination report was inadequate.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal for a higher initial rating for his coronary artery disease (CAD) status post myocardial infarction is remanded due to an inadequate VA examination.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's CAD status post myocardial infarction is rated at 100 percent from April 1, 2021 due to the ability to perform with a workload of 3 METs or less.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.