The Board has decided that the Veteran's claim for service connection for angiolipomas (claimed as fatty tumors due to exposure to burn pits in Iraq) is remanded. The case will be returned to the examiner for further review and an opinion regarding the etiology of the condition.
The deciding factor: The January 2019 VA medical opinion was inadequate because it did not provide a reasoned analysis for its conclusion, failed to address the Veteran's lay statements about injuries sustained during service, and did not consider the potential link between burn pit exposure and angiolipomas.
- Claimed conditions
- angiolipomas
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 13, 2020
- Citation
- 20033547
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 20033547.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's lipomas and angiolipomas are remanded for further development, including obtaining service personnel records and verifying in-service exposure to radiation. An addendum opinion is needed from a different examiner to address the etiology of the lipomas and angiolipomas, as well as their relationship to service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's angiolipomas, characterized as fatty tumors, are not related to service, including exposure to burn pits or physical trauma during service. The evidence does not support a finding of service connection for these conditions.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal has been withdrawn by the appellant through his authorized representative before a decision was made.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development to determine the severity of his HIV, chronic fatigue syndrome, and skin disorders. His claims for TDIU and special monthly compensation on account of being housebound are also being remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.