Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Veteran's request for an earlier effective date than July 1, 2009 for the award of a 30% evaluation for right foot injury with great toe fracture is dismissed.,The Veteran's request for an earlier effective date than May 7, 2012 for the grant of service connection for a right hip strain is dismissed.,The Veteran's request for an earlier effective date than March 12, 2010 for the award of service connection for low back disability with a 20% evaluation is dismissed.,The Veteran's requests for earlier effective dates prior to August 18, 2015 for impairment of right hip, limitation of flexion of right thigh (hip), left hip strain, and limitation of flexion of left thigh (hip) are all dismissed.,The Veteran's request for an earlier effective date than August 18, 2015 for a 20% evaluation for right shoulder rotator cuff tendonitis status-post surgery is dismissed.

The deciding factor: The Board determined that the Veteran’s requests for earlier effective dates were freestanding claims and thus could not be granted as they did not involve reopening of previously denied claims.,The Board found that the Veteran's requests for earlier effective dates related to service connection decisions, which are final when a NOD is not filed within one year of the decision. The Veteran did not file a NOD in these cases.,The Board concluded that the Veteran’s requests were freestanding claims and thus could not be granted as they did not involve reopening of previously denied claims.,The Board found that the Veteran's requests for earlier effective dates related to service connection decisions, which are final when a NOD is not filed within one year of the decision. The Veteran did not file a NOD in these cases.,The Board determined that the Veteran’s requests were freestanding claims and thus could not be granted as they did not involve reopening of previously denied claims.,The Board found that the Veteran's requests for earlier effective dates related to service connection decisions, which are final when a NOD is not filed within one year of the decision. The Veteran did not file a NOD in these cases.,The Board concluded that the Veteran’s requests were freestanding claims and thus could not be granted as they did not involve reopening of previously denied claims.

Claimed conditions
Right foot injury with great toe fracture, Right hip strain, Low back disability, Impairment of right thigh (hip), Left hip strain, Limitation of flexion of left thigh (hip), Right shoulder rotator cuff tendonitis status-post surgery
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 20, 2020
Citation
20035093

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20035093.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.