Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for service connection for disability manifested by memory loss is denied as there is no evidence of a current diagnosis.,The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for radiculopathy, sciatic nerve, right and left lower extremities prior to February 8, 2017 are denied as the evidence does not support an increase in rating beyond 10 percent.,The Veteran's claims for service connection for a right shoulder disorder, left shoulder disorder, right knee disorder, and left knee disorder are remanded due to the need for additional VA examinations and etiological opinions.,The Veteran's claim for TDIU is also remanded as it is inextricably intertwined with his service connection claims.

The deciding factor: There is no evidence of a current diagnosis of disability manifested by memory loss. The Veteran's medical records do not reflect any diagnosis or treatment related to this condition.,The Veteran's radiculopathy has been rated at the maximum available rating (40 percent) and there is no additional evidence that would warrant an increase in rating beyond 10 percent.,VA clinical records from the mid-2000s to 2014 focus more on complaints of cervical radiculopathy rather than lumbar radiculopathy. The Veteran's bilateral lumbar radiculopathy is characterized as intermittent with sharp pain and numbness resulting in mild incomplete paralysis.,The Veteran has not been afforded a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of his knee and shoulder conditions, thus remand for such examinations is necessary under McClendon v. Nicholson (2006).,The Veteran's service-connected lumbosacral strain with intervertebral disc syndrome spondylolisthesis and arthritis could be related to his military service, but a VA examination is needed to determine the nature and etiology of his knee and shoulder conditions.

Claimed conditions
Memory loss, Right Shoulder Disorder, Left Shoulder Disorder, Right Knee Disorder, Left Knee Disorder
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 20, 2020
Citation
20035240

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 20035240.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.